n2 based on PK metric with higher CV [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Elena777 – Belarus, 2019-09-16 19:48 (434 d 23:56 ago) – Posting: # 20601
Views: 4,507

Dear Helmut,

Still need some clarifications on the question from Astea:

» a) first step - estimated power is less than target (80%) for Cmax and more than target for AUC, besides 90%CI for AUC is OK.

To be in compliance with method C of Potvin, we re-calculate CI for Cmax with α=0,0294. Let`s assume that BE criterion for Cmax is met after this step. Should we also re-calculate CI for AUC with α=0,0294? Otherwise, finally we will have the following in a CSR: BE criterion was met for AUC using α=0,05 (90%CI) and BE criterion was met for Cmax using α=0,0294 (94,12% CI). Does it look OK?

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,206 posts in 4,425 threads, 1,481 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 18:44 CET (Europe/Vienna)

All we know about the world teaches us that the effects of A and B
are always different—in some decimal place—for any A and B.
Thus asking “are the effects different?” is foolish.    John W. Tukey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5