Software validation, another round [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by amer – Australia, 2019-09-12 07:26 (2102 d 21:01 ago) – Posting: # 20590
Views: 9,612

:lol3: I’m always a little bit skeptic when one tries to validate own code (including f**ing expensive “validation packs” sold by vendors of commercial software). Hence, we have to find another one. Cross-validation would do.


I may be able to validate wagner-nelson in ivivc for R (assumes 1-comp model) with numerical deconvolution/convolution using RIVIVC package (no asumption about model structure) but there isn't enough hours in the day. will do at some stage.

suggestion: the ivivc for R can be updated to do numerical deconvolution/convolution option because what if the disposition is not 1 comp, then wanger-nelson is limited.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
16 visitors (0 registered, 16 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To call the statistician after the experiment is done
may be no more than asking him to perform a postmortem examination:
he may be able to say what the experiment died of.    R.A. Fisher

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5