Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Software validation, another round [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by amer – Australia, 2019-09-12 03:26  – Posting: # 20590
Views: 269

» I’m always a little bit skeptic when one tries to validate own code (including f**ing expensive “validation packs” sold by vendors of commercial software). Hence, we have to find another one. Cross-validation would do.

I may be able to validate wagner-nelson in ivivc for R (assumes 1-comp model) with numerical deconvolution/convolution using RIVIVC package (no asumption about model structure) but there isn't enough hours in the day. will do at some stage.

suggestion: the ivivc for R can be updated to do numerical deconvolution/convolution option because what if the disposition is not 1 comp, then wanger-nelson is limited.

Complete thread:

• predicting in vivo PK profiles from in vitro data after establishing IVIVC amer 2019-09-09 05:04 [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC] 
  • external predictability for ivivc yjlee168 2019-09-09 10:46
    • external predictability for ivivc amer 2019-09-10 02:31
      • identical pH Helmut 2019-09-10 10:58
        • identical pH yjlee168 2019-09-10 15:30
      • R scripts/codes for in-vivo conc. yjlee168 2019-09-10 15:13
        • Software validation, another round Helmut 2019-09-10 15:37
          • Deconvolution mittyri 2019-09-10 15:54
          • Software validation, another round yjlee168 2019-09-11 10:29
            • Software validation, another round Helmut 2019-09-11 13:39
              • Software validation, another round amer 2019-09-12 05:26
                • Should we also consider to validate the validation? yjlee168 2019-09-12 09:46
                  • Who inspects the inspectors? Helmut 2019-09-13 12:07
                    • Who inspects the inspectors? nobody 2019-09-13 12:55
                      • Sapienti sat Helmut 2019-09-13 12:59
        • R scripts/codes for in-vivo conc. amer 2019-09-11 05:35
          • Bioavailabity term in predicted in-vivo conc. yjlee168 2019-09-11 10:16