Geometric mean and CV [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-09-06 18:15 (875 d 21:53 ago) – Posting: # 20549
Views: 5,011

Hi Rocco,

» So basically your analysis follows from the fact that the variance of the difference of T and R equal the sum of the variance of T and the variance of R, correct?

Well, you have four variance components (s²wR, s²wT, s²bT, s²bR). Then
  1. Full replicate designs
    All are identifiable.
  2. 2×2×2 crossover (balanced and complete for simplicity – otherwise, weighting is required)
    s²w = (s²wR + s²wT)/2 and s²b = (s²bT + s²bR)/2.
  3. 2 group parallel
    Only the pooled (total) s²p. With a tricky mixed-effects model you could get s²pT and s²pR.
  4. One treatment (FIM)
    Only s²p.
Hence, if you want to plan #3 based on #4 you have to assume that the variances (within, between) of T and R are at least similar. ;-)

» And you are using the geometric CV as the estimate of CVp for R?

Yes.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,858 posts in 4,574 threads, 1,554 registered users;
online 14 (0 registered, 14 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 15:08 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Truth in science can be defined as the working hypothesis best suited
to open the way to the next better one.    Konrad Lorenz

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5