Geometric mean and CV [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-09-06 18:15 (412 d 02:11 ago) – Posting: # 20549
Views: 3,719

Hi Rocco,

» So basically your analysis follows from the fact that the variance of the difference of T and R equal the sum of the variance of T and the variance of R, correct?

Well, you have four variance components (s²wR, s²wT, s²bT, s²bR). Then
  1. Full replicate designs
    All are identifiable.
  2. 2×2×2 crossover (balanced and complete for simplicity – otherwise, weighting is required)
    s²w = (s²wR + s²wT)/2 and s²b = (s²bT + s²bR)/2.
  3. 2 group parallel
    Only the pooled (total) s²p. With a tricky mixed-effects model you could get s²pT and s²pR.
  4. One treatment (FIM)
    Only s²p.
Hence, if you want to plan #3 based on #4 you have to assume that the variances (within, between) of T and R are at least similar. ;-)

» And you are using the geometric CV as the estimate of CVp for R?


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,176 posts in 4,413 threads, 1,475 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 20:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is not so much that I have confidence in scientists being right,
but that I have so much in nonscientists being wrong.    Isaac Asimov

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz