Not sure whether it makes sense [Design Issues]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2019-08-03 21:35 (2509 d 02:40 ago) – Posting: # 20470
Views: 5,474

Dear Abhimanyu,

❝ ...

❝ What would be change in Proc GlM / Proc Mixed for Calculate Swr, 95% Upper bound (Scaled), and 90% CI (Unscaled):confused::confused:.


Nothing since the effects in GLM or mixed are not dependent from the used sequences, only the number of levels of the effect "sequence" or "period" changes. But this has not to be specified in the code (SAS or others). It will be taken automatically from the dataset you use.
Thus you have:
  log(PK) ~ period + sequence + subject(sequence) - for calculation of sWR
  log(PK) ~ treatment + period + sequence + subject(sequence) - for 90% CI
in R lingo.
In SAS you have to modify the model statement in Proc GLM accordingly.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
106 visitors (0 registered, 106 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Always listen to experts.
They’ll tell you what can’t be done and why.
Then do it.    Robert A. Heinlein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5