Not sure whether it makes sense [Design Issues]

posted by abhimanyu – Banglore, 2019-08-03 15:54 (1956 d 23:35 ago) – Posting: # 20469
Views: 3,799

Hi Helmut/SP,

❝ Maybe it is better to opt for a modified Williams’ design T1T2RR | T2RT1R | RT1RT2 | RRT2T1 which gives

T1 RR |  RT1R | RT1R  | RR T1 and

 T2RR | T2R R | R RT2 | RRT2 

❝ At least balanced for T1 and T2 (once in every period).

❝ However, we have R twice in periods 1&2 and only once in periods 3&4.



If we consider modified Williams’ design with this sequence T1T2RR | T2RT1R | RT1RT2 | RRT2T1 Then,

What would be change in Proc GlM / Proc Mixed for Calculate Swr, 95% Upper bound (Scaled), and 90% CI (Unscaled):confused::confused:.



Thanking you in advance!!:-)

Abhimanyu

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,336 posts in 4,902 threads, 1,666 registered users;
38 visitors (0 registered, 38 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:30 CET (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5