Not sure whether it makes sense [Design Issues]

posted by abhimanyu – Banglore, 2019-08-03 15:54 (1777 d 01:42 ago) – Posting: # 20469
Views: 3,192

Hi Helmut/SP,

❝ Maybe it is better to opt for a modified Williams’ design T1T2RR | T2RT1R | RT1RT2 | RRT2T1 which gives

T1 RR |  RT1R | RT1R  | RR T1 and

 T2RR | T2R R | R RT2 | RRT2 

❝ At least balanced for T1 and T2 (once in every period).

❝ However, we have R twice in periods 1&2 and only once in periods 3&4.

If we consider modified Williams’ design with this sequence T1T2RR | T2RT1R | RT1RT2 | RRT2T1 Then,

What would be change in Proc GlM / Proc Mixed for Calculate Swr, 95% Upper bound (Scaled), and 90% CI (Unscaled):confused::confused:.

Thanking you in advance!!:-)


Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
23,056 posts in 4,840 threads, 1,641 registered users;
156 visitors (0 registered, 156 guests [including 76 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Exploratory analysis: The art of finding a Rembrandt
in a Jackson Pollock.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz