Pragmatic assumptions [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2019-07-22 01:46 (585 d 03:34 ago) – Posting: # 20419
Views: 2,773

Dear Helmut,

» I must confess that I don’t get what Luther Gwaza et al.1,2 means by his “pragmatic method”:

agree, intricated explanation
In the discussion part I've found

The method based on a combination of both (SE calculation of the heteroscedastic method and degrees of freedom of the homoscedastic method), which is the simplest numerical calculation, gives results similar to those obtained with the heteroscedastic approach, showing that the contribution of the different method of calculation of the degrees of freedom is negligible.

Heteroscedatic method + simplified DFs

I also found some paper where the authors are using that approach, but I don't think their understanding of 'pragmatic' is correct

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,356 posts in 4,458 threads, 1,493 registered users;
online 9 (0 registered, 9 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 04:21 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Those who make no mistakes are making the biggest mistakes of all 
they are attempting nothing new.    Anthony de Mello

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5