Log in
RegisterPragmatic assumptions [General Statistics]
Dear Helmut,
» I must confess that I don’t get what Luther Gwaza et al.1,2 means by his “pragmatic method”:
agree, intricated explanation
In the discussion part I've found
I also found some paper where the authors are using that approach, but I don't think their understanding of 'pragmatic' is correct
» I must confess that I don’t get what Luther Gwaza et al.1,2 means by his “pragmatic method”:
agree, intricated explanation
In the discussion part I've found
The method based on a combination of both (SE calculation of the heteroscedastic method and degrees of freedom of the homoscedastic method), which is the simplest numerical calculation, gives results similar to those obtained with the heteroscedastic approach, showing that the contribution of the different method of calculation of the degrees of freedom is negligible.
Heteroscedatic method + simplified DFsI also found some paper where the authors are using that approach, but I don't think their understanding of 'pragmatic' is correct
—
Kind regards,
Mittyri
Kind regards,
Mittyri
Complete thread:
- Indirect adjusted comparisons in BE Helmut 2019-07-21 15:20 [General Statistics]
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- Pragmatic assumptionsmittyri 2019-07-22 01:46
- Indirect adjusted comparisons in BE Shuanghe 2019-07-22 09:53
- Indirect adjusted comparisons in BE nobody 2019-07-22 13:32
- Indirect adjusted comparisons in BE Shuanghe 2019-07-22 15:20
- Indirect adjusted comparisons in BE Helmut 2019-07-22 15:45
- Indirect adjusted comparisons in BE nobody 2019-07-22 18:38
- Indirect adjusted comparisons in BE nobody 2019-07-22 13:32
Ing. Helmut Schütz