One fail and one success, should it be accepted? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2019-07-18 19:14 (497 d 09:48 ago) – Posting: # 20394
Views: 1,570

» Dear guys,
» We did a BE trial using a partial replicated design(TRR,RTR,RRT), but it was fail to demonstrate BE because the Cmax of one subject after administration of test drug was too much higher than reference drug, and when excluding the data of this subject, the results showed bioequivalent. But actually there were no reason to exclude the data from this subject.
» And we conducted another BE trial, this time using full replicated design(TRTR,RTRT), and this time the result showed bioequivalent.

What about AUC from that subject?

J

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,213 posts in 4,426 threads, 1,483 registered users;
online 12 (1 registered, 11 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 04:03 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Biostatistician. One who has neither the intellect for mathematics
nor the commitment for medicine but likes to dabble in both.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5