One fail and one success, should it be accepted? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2019-07-18 21:14 (1767 d 14:37 ago) – Posting: # 20394
Views: 2,421

❝ Dear guys,

❝ We did a BE trial using a partial replicated design(TRR,RTR,RRT), but it was fail to demonstrate BE because the Cmax of one subject after administration of test drug was too much higher than reference drug, and when excluding the data of this subject, the results showed bioequivalent. But actually there were no reason to exclude the data from this subject.

❝ And we conducted another BE trial, this time using full replicated design(TRTR,RTRT), and this time the result showed bioequivalent.


What about AUC from that subject?

J

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,033 posts in 4,835 threads, 1,642 registered users;
51 visitors (0 registered, 51 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5