One fail and one success, should it be accepted? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ssussu – China, 2019-07-17 11:45 (1119 d 10:44 ago) – Posting: # 20381
Views: 2,403

Dear guys,
We did a BE trial using a partial replicated design(TRR,RTR,RRT), but it was fail to demonstrate BE because the Cmax of one subject after administration of test drug was too much higher than reference drug, and when excluding the data of this subject, the results showed bioequivalent. But actually there were no reason to exclude the data from this subject.
And we conducted another BE trial, this time using full replicated design(TRTR,RTRT), and this time the result showed bioequivalent.
What I want to ask is, whether the second trial which showed bioeuquivalent would be accepted by agency. Any suggestions about this if we want to convince the agency to accept the successful one?


Thanks

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,289 posts in 4,666 threads, 1,585 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 22:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The existing scientific concepts cover always only
a very limited part of reality,
and the other part that has not yet
been understood is infinite.    Werner Heisenberg

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5