One fail and one success, should it be accepted? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ssussu – China, 2019-07-17 09:45  – Posting: # 20381
Views: 459

Dear guys,
We did a BE trial using a partial replicated design(TRR,RTR,RRT), but it was fail to demonstrate BE because the Cmax of one subject after administration of test drug was too much higher than reference drug, and when excluding the data of this subject, the results showed bioequivalent. But actually there were no reason to exclude the data from this subject.
And we conducted another BE trial, this time using full replicated design(TRTR,RTRT), and this time the result showed bioequivalent.
What I want to ask is, whether the second trial which showed bioeuquivalent would be accepted by agency. Any suggestions about this if we want to convince the agency to accept the successful one?


Thanks

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,688 posts in 4,178 threads, 1,353 registered users;
online 14 (0 registered, 14 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 18:32 UTC

Power. That which statisticians are always calculating
but never have.    Stephen Senn

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5