WHO: Chapeau! [BE/BA News]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-06-10 13:23 (2148 d 22:17 ago) – Posting: # 20322
Views: 8,105

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ ❝ Obviously people at the WHO are more clever than the EMA’s 


Update 22 November 2018:

As of November 2018, PQTm will accept the use of scaling of the AUC acceptance criteria for data from a full 4-period replicate design study for products containing albendazole or mebendazole. It is not necessary to provide a scientific justification a priori as described below for albendazole or mebendazole.


Only those two? No other HVD(P)s in the list of essential drugs? Or no studies submitted in the pilot phase since June 2017?

❝ They specifically seem to want to compare variability for Ref and Test.


Still no information how that should be done.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
90 visitors (0 registered, 90 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5