Log in
RegisterImpartial Witness in BABE study [GxP / QC / QA]
Hi yatish gosai
and all posters on this thread,
to be honest I think this is a great, great question and it is one that made me think very hard for a prolonged moment.
The mere fact that such a question is asked should give rise to a lot of reflection on the part of regulators. What is obvious to a regulator or someone from one geographical region is obviously not obvious to others. At the end of the day guidelines are not intended solely for regulators but for all involved parties.
So here's something to work with.
and all posters on this thread,
to be honest I think this is a great, great question and it is one that made me think very hard for a prolonged moment.
The mere fact that such a question is asked should give rise to a lot of reflection on the part of regulators. What is obvious to a regulator or someone from one geographical region is obviously not obvious to others. At the end of the day guidelines are not intended solely for regulators but for all involved parties.
So here's something to work with.
—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Complete thread:
- Impartial Witness in BABE study yatish gosai 2019-05-22 07:49 [GxP / QC / QA]
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- Impartial Witness in BABE study Ohlbe 2019-05-22 10:48
- Impartial Witness in BABE study yatish gosai 2019-05-22 11:04
- New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules: Wrong definition of BE Helmut 2019-05-24 12:20
- Husband ≠ impartial Helmut 2019-05-22 10:52
- Husband ≠ impartial yatish gosai 2019-05-22 11:04
- Husband ≠ impartial nobody 2019-05-22 15:56
- Husband ≠ impartial yatish gosai 2019-05-22 11:04
- Impartial Witness in BABE studyElMaestro 2019-05-22 16:11
- Impartial Witness in BABE study Ohlbe 2019-05-22 10:48
Ing. Helmut Schütz