Impartial Witness in BABE study [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-05-22 18:11 (2236 d 15:53 ago) – Posting: # 20295
Views: 8,520

Hi yatish gosai
and all posters on this thread,

to be honest I think this is a great, great question and it is one that made me think very hard for a prolonged moment.

The mere fact that such a question is asked should give rise to a lot of reflection on the part of regulators. What is obvious to a regulator or someone from one geographical region is obviously not obvious to others. At the end of the day guidelines are not intended solely for regulators but for all involved parties.

So here's something to work with.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,676 registered users;
48 visitors (0 registered, 48 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:05 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy.    Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5