Conclusion [NCA / SHAM]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2019-04-17 15:42 (679 d 14:33 ago) – Posting: # 20184
Views: 4,501

Hi Helmut,

thank you so much for comrehensive answer!

» I corrected a typo in your original post
forgot to execute it on clean environment, sorry!

» So what do you conclude?
pAUC is more sensitive, but the sensitivity is still low (nothing new...)

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,355 posts in 4,458 threads, 1,493 registered users;
online 7 (0 registered, 7 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 05:16 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The rise of biometry in this 20th century,
like that of geometry in the 3rd century before Christ,
seems to mark out one of the great ages or critical periods
in the advance of the human understanding.    R.A. Fisher

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5