Conclusion [NCA / SHAM]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2019-04-17 15:42 (788 d 01:21 ago) – Posting: # 20184
Views: 4,910

Hi Helmut,

thank you so much for comrehensive answer!

» I corrected a typo in your original post
forgot to execute it on clean environment, sorry!

» So what do you conclude?
pAUC is more sensitive, but the sensitivity is still low (nothing new...)

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,518 posts in 4,498 threads, 1,523 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 17:03 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A refund for defective software might be nice,
except it would bankrupt the entire software industry
in the first year.    Andrew S. Tanenbaum

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5