Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Conclusion

Conclusion [NCA / SHAM]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2019-04-17 17:42 (2211 d 19:29 ago) – Posting: # 20184
Views: 9,749

Hi Helmut,

thank you so much for comprehensive answer!

❝ I corrected a typo in your original post

forgot to execute it on clean environment, sorry!

❝ So what do you conclude?

pAUC is more sensitive, but the sensitivity is still low (nothing new...)

—
Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

Metrics for absorption Helmut 2019-04-15 12:08 [NCA / SHAM]
- Metrics for absorption nobody 2019-04-15 12:15
  - Metrics for absorption ElMaestro 2019-04-15 12:23
    - Metrics for absorption nobody 2019-04-15 12:39
  - Metrics for absorption Helmut 2019-04-15 13:02
    - Metrics for absorption nobody 2019-04-15 13:48
      - Metrics for absorption Helmut 2019-04-15 19:31
        
        Metrics for absorption nobody 2019-04-16 09:34
        
        Metrics for absorption nobody 2019-04-16 15:15
        
        Metrics for absorption Helmut 2019-04-16 17:01
        
        Metrics for absorption nobody 2019-04-17 11:15
        
        Simulation framework mittyri 2019-04-17 01:21
        
        Simulation framework Helmut 2019-04-17 13:31
        
        Conclusionmittyri 2019-04-17 15:42
        
        Conclusion & beyond Helmut 2019-04-17 17:05

Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
108 visitors (0 registered, 108 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

[Those] who have an excessive faith in their theories or in their
ideas are not only poorly disposed to make discoveries, but they
also make very poor observations. Claude Bernard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz