Conclusion [NCA / SHAM]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2019-04-17 15:42 (886 d 13:18 ago) – Posting: # 20184
Views: 5,286

Hi Helmut,

thank you so much for comrehensive answer!

» I corrected a typo in your original post
forgot to execute it on clean environment, sorry!

» So what do you conclude?
pAUC is more sensitive, but the sensitivity is still low (nothing new...)

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,691 posts in 4,534 threads, 1,541 registered users;
online 19 (0 registered, 19 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 05:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

They were “so intent of making everything numerical”
that they frequently missed seeing
what was there to be seen.    Barbara McClintock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5