Conclusion [NCA / SHAM]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2019-04-17 15:42 (688 d 03:16 ago) – Posting: # 20184
Views: 4,528

Hi Helmut,

thank you so much for comrehensive answer!

» I corrected a typo in your original post
forgot to execute it on clean environment, sorry!

» So what do you conclude?
pAUC is more sensitive, but the sensitivity is still low (nothing new...)

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,368 posts in 4,462 threads, 1,494 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 17:58 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The statistician has no magic touch by which
he may come in at the stage of tabulation
and make something of nothing.    W. Edwards Deming

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5