Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-16 09:34 (1172 d 15:16 ago) – Posting: # 20172
Views: 6,087

(edited by nobody on 2019-04-16 10:39)

...maybe I got you completely wrong, but for me ka ratio varies 48-fold, while cmax ratio only 2.50-fold, pAUC 4.47-fold and cmax/AUC 2.34-fold over the range tested.

So pAUC is indeed the best of all-not-so-wonderful parameters?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,181 posts in 4,647 threads, 1,572 registered users;
online 7 (0 registered, 7 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 00:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Reach for the stars,
even if you have to stand on a cactus.    Susan Longacre

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5