Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-16 11:34 (1324 d 07:35 ago) – Posting: # 20172
Views: 6,266

...maybe I got you completely wrong, but for me ka ratio varies 48-fold, while cmax ratio only 2.50-fold, pAUC 4.47-fold and cmax/AUC 2.34-fold over the range tested.

So pAUC is indeed the best of all-not-so-wonderful parameters?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,418 posts in 4,693 threads, 1,598 registered users;
11 visitors (0 registered, 11 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:10 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Intellect distinguishes between the possible and the impossible;
reason distinguishes between the sensible and the senseless.
Even the possible can be senseless.    Max Born

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5