Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-16 11:34 (2107 d 05:39 ago) – Posting: # 20172
Views: 9,445

...maybe I got you completely wrong, but for me ka ratio varies 48-fold, while cmax ratio only 2.50-fold, pAUC 4.47-fold and cmax/AUC 2.34-fold over the range tested.

So pAUC is indeed the best of all-not-so-wonderful parameters?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,363 posts in 4,906 threads, 1,676 registered users;
117 visitors (0 registered, 117 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:14 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The combination of some data and an aching desire
for an answer does not ensure that a reasonable answer
can be extracted from a given body of data.    John W. Tukey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5