Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-16 09:34 (589 d 08:54 ago) – Posting: # 20172
Views: 4,398

(edited by nobody on 2019-04-16 10:39)

...maybe I got you completely wrong, but for me ka ratio varies 48-fold, while cmax ratio only 2.50-fold, pAUC 4.47-fold and cmax/AUC 2.34-fold over the range tested.

So pAUC is indeed the best of all-not-so-wonderful parameters?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,210 posts in 4,426 threads, 1,481 registered users;
online 13 (1 registered, 12 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 17:29 CET (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t fix by analysis
what you bungled by design.    Richard J. Light, Judith D. Singer, John B. Willett

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5