Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]
...maybe I got you completely wrong, but for me ka ratio varies 48-fold, while cmax ratio only 2.50-fold, pAUC 4.47-fold and cmax/AUC 2.34-fold over the range tested.
So pAUC is indeed the best of all-not-so-wonderful parameters?
So pAUC is indeed the best of all-not-so-wonderful parameters?
—
Kindest regards, nobody
Kindest regards, nobody
Complete thread:
- Metrics for absorption Helmut 2019-04-15 12:08 [NCA / SHAM]
- Metrics for absorption nobody 2019-04-15 12:15
- Metrics for absorption ElMaestro 2019-04-15 12:23
- Metrics for absorption nobody 2019-04-15 12:39
- Metrics for absorption Helmut 2019-04-15 13:02
- Metrics for absorption nobody 2019-04-15 13:48
- Metrics for absorption Helmut 2019-04-15 19:31
- Metrics for absorptionnobody 2019-04-16 09:34
- Metrics for absorption nobody 2019-04-16 15:15
- Metrics for absorption Helmut 2019-04-16 17:01
- Metrics for absorption nobody 2019-04-17 11:15
- Metrics for absorption Helmut 2019-04-16 17:01
- Metrics for absorption nobody 2019-04-16 15:15
- Simulation framework mittyri 2019-04-17 01:21
- Simulation framework Helmut 2019-04-17 13:31
- Conclusion mittyri 2019-04-17 15:42
- Conclusion & beyond Helmut 2019-04-17 17:05
- Conclusion mittyri 2019-04-17 15:42
- Simulation framework Helmut 2019-04-17 13:31
- Metrics for absorptionnobody 2019-04-16 09:34
- Metrics for absorption Helmut 2019-04-15 19:31
- Metrics for absorption nobody 2019-04-15 13:48
- Metrics for absorption ElMaestro 2019-04-15 12:23
- Metrics for absorption nobody 2019-04-15 12:15