Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-16 09:34 (680 d 21:08 ago) – Posting: # 20172
Views: 4,748

(edited by nobody on 2019-04-16 10:39)

...maybe I got you completely wrong, but for me ka ratio varies 48-fold, while cmax ratio only 2.50-fold, pAUC 4.47-fold and cmax/AUC 2.34-fold over the range tested.

So pAUC is indeed the best of all-not-so-wonderful parameters?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,355 posts in 4,458 threads, 1,493 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 05:43 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The rise of biometry in this 20th century,
like that of geometry in the 3rd century before Christ,
seems to mark out one of the great ages or critical periods
in the advance of the human understanding.    R.A. Fisher

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5