Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-16 09:34 (832 d 14:36 ago) – Posting: # 20172
Views: 5,305

(edited by nobody on 2019-04-16 10:39)

...maybe I got you completely wrong, but for me ka ratio varies 48-fold, while cmax ratio only 2.50-fold, pAUC 4.47-fold and cmax/AUC 2.34-fold over the range tested.

So pAUC is indeed the best of all-not-so-wonderful parameters?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,589 posts in 4,512 threads, 1,530 registered users;
online 13 (1 registered, 12 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 00:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5