Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-16 11:34 (1834 d 03:50 ago) – Posting: # 20172
Views: 7,506

...maybe I got you completely wrong, but for me ka ratio varies 48-fold, while cmax ratio only 2.50-fold, pAUC 4.47-fold and cmax/AUC 2.34-fold over the range tested.

So pAUC is indeed the best of all-not-so-wonderful parameters?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,990 posts in 4,826 threads, 1,647 registered users;
54 visitors (1 registered, 53 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you don’t like something change it;
if you can’t change it, change the way you think about it.    Mary Engelbreit

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5