Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-16 09:34 (838 d 21:46 ago) – Posting: # 20172
Views: 5,322

(edited by nobody on 2019-04-16 10:39)

...maybe I got you completely wrong, but for me ka ratio varies 48-fold, while cmax ratio only 2.50-fold, pAUC 4.47-fold and cmax/AUC 2.34-fold over the range tested.

So pAUC is indeed the best of all-not-so-wonderful parameters?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,596 posts in 4,516 threads, 1,532 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 07:20 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded
if you tied them the usual way.
This happens to us all the time with computers,
and nobody thinks of complaining.    Jef Raskin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5