Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-16 09:34 (643 d 02:23 ago) – Posting: # 20172
Views: 4,600

(edited by nobody on 2019-04-16 10:39)

...maybe I got you completely wrong, but for me ka ratio varies 48-fold, while cmax ratio only 2.50-fold, pAUC 4.47-fold and cmax/AUC 2.34-fold over the range tested.

So pAUC is indeed the best of all-not-so-wonderful parameters?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,303 posts in 4,441 threads, 1,487 registered users;
online 9 (0 registered, 9 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 10:58 CET (Europe/Vienna)

I believe there is no philosophical high-road in science,
with epistemological signposts. No, we are in a jungle
and find our way by trial and error,
building our road behind us as we proceed.    Max Born

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5