Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-16 09:34  – Posting: # 20172
Views: 337

(edited by nobody on 2019-04-16 10:39)

...maybe I got you completely wrong, but for me ka ratio varies 48-fold, while cmax ratio only 2.50-fold, pAUC 4.47-fold and cmax/AUC 2.34-fold over the range tested.

So pAUC is indeed the best of all-not-so-wonderful parameters?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,400 posts in 4,121 threads, 1,323 registered users;
online 13 (0 registered, 13 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 20:28 CEST

Science is the great antidote to the poison
of enthusiasm and superstition.    Adam Smith

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5