Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-16 11:34 (1512 d 02:35 ago) – Posting: # 20172
Views: 6,527

...maybe I got you completely wrong, but for me ka ratio varies 48-fold, while cmax ratio only 2.50-fold, pAUC 4.47-fold and cmax/AUC 2.34-fold over the range tested.

So pAUC is indeed the best of all-not-so-wonderful parameters?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,617 posts in 4,740 threads, 1,611 registered users;
27 visitors (1 registered, 26 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are in fact two things, science and opinion;
the former begets knowledge, the latter ignorance.    Hippocrates

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5