Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-15 14:15 (1624 d 21:14 ago) – Posting: # 20164
Views: 6,911

Hi

first thought

"Cmax is ...is nonspecific to it (reflects also the extent of absorption as well as the rates of disposition processes),..."

Hmm, how is AUCp not reflecting disposition processes?

"...lacks kinetic sensitivity even following a single administration."

How much sensitivity is needed in the first place? Or are we creating problems by "overly sensitive" methods with no relevance in clinical practice?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,759 posts in 4,775 threads, 1,628 registered users;
16 visitors (0 registered, 16 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Whenever a theory appears to you as the only possible one,
take this as a sign that you have neither understood the theory
nor the problem which it was intended to solve.    Karl R. Popper

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5