Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-15 12:15 (1167 d 19:17 ago) – Posting: # 20164
Views: 6,166

Hi

first thought

"Cmax is ...is nonspecific to it (reflects also the extent of absorption as well as the rates of disposition processes),..."

Hmm, how is AUCp not reflecting disposition processes?

"...lacks kinetic sensitivity even following a single administration."

How much sensitivity is needed in the first place? Or are we creating problems by "overly sensitive" methods with no relevance in clinical practice?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,167 posts in 4,645 threads, 1,572 registered users;
online 12 (0 registered, 12 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 07:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The person interested in success has to learn
to view failure as a healthy, inevitable part
of the process of getting to the top.    Joyce Brothers

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5