Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-15 10:15 (790 d 03:51 ago) – Posting: # 20164
Views: 5,219

Hi

first thought

"Cmax is ...is nonspecific to it (reflects also the extent of absorption as well as the rates of disposition processes),..."

Hmm, how is AUCp not reflecting disposition processes?

"...lacks kinetic sensitivity even following a single administration."

How much sensitivity is needed in the first place? Or are we creating problems by "overly sensitive" methods with no relevance in clinical practice?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,518 posts in 4,498 threads, 1,523 registered users;
online 8 (0 registered, 8 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 14:06 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

A refund for defective software might be nice,
except it would bankrupt the entire software industry
in the first year.    Andrew S. Tanenbaum

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5