Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-15 14:15 (2029 d 10:09 ago) – Posting: # 20164
Views: 9,092

Hi

first thought

"Cmax is ...is nonspecific to it (reflects also the extent of absorption as well as the rates of disposition processes),..."

Hmm, how is AUCp not reflecting disposition processes?

"...lacks kinetic sensitivity even following a single administration."

How much sensitivity is needed in the first place? Or are we creating problems by "overly sensitive" methods with no relevance in clinical practice?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,280 posts in 4,889 threads, 1,655 registered users;
76 visitors (0 registered, 76 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:25 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Freedom is always and exclusively
freedom for the one
who thinks differently.    Rosa Luxemburg

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5