Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-15 12:15  – Posting: # 20164
Views: 1,093

Hi

first thought

"Cmax is ...is nonspecific to it (reflects also the extent of absorption as well as the rates of disposition processes),..."

Hmm, how is AUCp not reflecting disposition processes?

"...lacks kinetic sensitivity even following a single administration."

How much sensitivity is needed in the first place? Or are we creating problems by "overly sensitive" methods with no relevance in clinical practice?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,537 posts in 4,144 threads, 1,338 registered users;
online 16 (0 registered, 16 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 17:25 CEST

When puzzled, it never hurts to read the primary documents –
a rather simple and self-evident principle that has, nonetheless,
completely disappeared from large sectors
of the American experience.    Stephen Jay Gould

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5