Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-15 12:15  – Posting: # 20164
Views: 426

Hi

first thought

"Cmax is ...is nonspecific to it (reflects also the extent of absorption as well as the rates of disposition processes),..."

Hmm, how is AUCp not reflecting disposition processes?

"...lacks kinetic sensitivity even following a single administration."

How much sensitivity is needed in the first place? Or are we creating problems by "overly sensitive" methods with no relevance in clinical practice?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,400 posts in 4,121 threads, 1,323 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 20:41 CEST

Science is the great antidote to the poison
of enthusiasm and superstition.    Adam Smith

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5