Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-15 12:15 (737 d 03:48 ago) – Posting: # 20164
Views: 5,027

Hi

first thought

"Cmax is ...is nonspecific to it (reflects also the extent of absorption as well as the rates of disposition processes),..."

Hmm, how is AUCp not reflecting disposition processes?

"...lacks kinetic sensitivity even following a single administration."

How much sensitivity is needed in the first place? Or are we creating problems by "overly sensitive" methods with no relevance in clinical practice?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,510 registered users;
online 12 (0 registered, 12 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 16:04 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In the Middles Ages the lingua franca of science was Latin.
Nowadays the language of science is bad English.    Anonymous

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5