Of historic(al) interest only [Power / Sample Size]
Hi sury,
I don’t understand. You have already an SOP without references – what does it say? How do you estimate a sample size right now?
These tables for α 0.05 (90% CI), 70/80/90% power and
Since power is nonlinear, you can’t easily interpolate if you are interested in anything not given in the tables. What if you want another α (two-stage adaptive and group-sequential designs) or an acceptance range of 75.00–133.33% (applicable in some jurisdictions for Cmax)?
NB, if you are interested in reference-scaling (FDA: RSABE, EMA: ABEL) you need yet other tables (covered designs: TRR|RTR|RRT and TRTR|RTRT).3 No tables exist for other designs (e.g., TRT|RTR – which is better than the lousy partial replicate), Health Canada’s ABEL, and the FDA’s RSABE for NTIDS.
Hence, I strongly suggest to opt for software, i.e., package
❝ I want to include the deletti tables in my SOP references …
I don’t understand. You have already an SOP without references – what does it say? How do you estimate a sample size right now?
These tables for α 0.05 (90% CI), 70/80/90% power and
- CV 5–30% (step size 5%), T/R-ratio 0.85–1.20 (step size 0.05);
for acceptance 80.00–125.00%1
- CV 5–20% (step size 2.5%), T/R-ratio 0.925–1.075 (step size 0.025);
for acceptance range 90.00–111.11%2
- CV 15–60% (step size 5%), T/R-ratio 0.75–1.35 (step size 0.05);
for acceptance range 70.00–142.86%2
Since power is nonlinear, you can’t easily interpolate if you are interested in anything not given in the tables. What if you want another α (two-stage adaptive and group-sequential designs) or an acceptance range of 75.00–133.33% (applicable in some jurisdictions for Cmax)?
NB, if you are interested in reference-scaling (FDA: RSABE, EMA: ABEL) you need yet other tables (covered designs: TRR|RTR|RRT and TRTR|RTRT).3 No tables exist for other designs (e.g., TRT|RTR – which is better than the lousy partial replicate), Health Canada’s ABEL, and the FDA’s RSABE for NTIDS.
Hence, I strongly suggest to opt for software, i.e., package
PowerTOST
4 for which supports all of those (plus paired and parallel designs, non-inferiority/-superiority, Fieller’s CI of ratios, dose-proportionality, …). - Diletti E, Hauschke D, Steinijans VW. Sample size determination for bioequivalence assessment by means of confidence intervals. Int J Clin Pharm Ther Toxicol. 1991;29(1):1–8.
- Diletti E, Hauschke D, Steinijans VW. Sample size determination: Extended tables for the multiplicative model and bioequivalence ranges of 0.9 to 1.11 and 0.7 to 1.43. Int J Clin Pharm Ther Toxicol. 1992;30(8):287–90.
- Tóthfalusi L, Endrényi L. Sample Sizes for Designing Bioequivalence Studies for Highly Variable Drugs. J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci. 2011;15(1):73–84. open access.
- Labes D, Schütz H, Lang B. PowerTOST: Power and Sample Size Based on Two One-Sided t-Tests (TOST) for (Bio)Equivalence Studies. 2018-04-12;1.4-7.
https://cran.r-project.org/package=PowerTOST.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Deletti tables for sample size sury 2019-03-19 12:22 [Power / Sample Size]
- Of historic(al) interest onlyHelmut 2019-03-19 13:27
- Of historic(al) interest only sury 2019-03-20 05:04
- Software validation – again and again Helmut 2019-03-20 12:12
- Software validation – again and again nobody 2019-03-20 16:20
- Fiaker und Apfelstrudel Helmut 2019-03-20 16:35
- Fiaker und Apfelstrudel nobody 2019-03-20 17:34
- Fiaker und Apfelstrudel Helmut 2019-03-20 17:54
- Fiaker und Apfelstrudel d_labes 2019-03-20 18:39
- Fiaker und Apfelstrudel ElMaestro 2019-03-20 22:09
- Fiaker und Apfelstrudel Helmut 2019-03-20 17:54
- Fiaker und Apfelstrudel nobody 2019-03-20 17:34
- Fiaker und Apfelstrudel Helmut 2019-03-20 16:35
- White-box validation mittyri 2019-03-20 21:09
- White-box validation Helmut 2019-03-21 00:19
- Software validation – again and again nobody 2019-03-20 16:20
- Power of Proc Power d_labes 2019-03-20 18:37
- Software validation – again and again Helmut 2019-03-20 12:12
- Of historic(al) interest only sury 2019-03-20 05:04
- Of historic(al) interest onlyHelmut 2019-03-19 13:27