old, obvious? [Bioanalytics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-03-19 09:26 (2094 d 04:42 ago) – Posting: # 20049
Views: 6,312

Hi Hötzi,

❝ Congratulations for an obvious solution (aka, re-inventing the wheel). ;-) See what Ohlbe wrote here and there.


Is the proposal really old and is it really obvious?

I see there was in the past a proposal or two about 1/(Conc^z) where z is not an integer, but I am not sure if there was ever anyone who:
  1. Defined an objective function which seeks to minimize a relevant measure of departure from predictability (that same predictability which maps into the criteria of guidelines).
  2. Showed the existence of a minimum of that function.

Novelty here is not the existence of a funky value of z, but the way of finding it, the nature of it.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,336 posts in 4,902 threads, 1,666 registered users;
28 visitors (0 registered, 28 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:08 CET (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5