An old solution [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-03-16 23:05 (764 d 18:05 ago) – Posting: # 20042
Views: 3,583

Hi ElMaestro,

» […] The smartest and most empirical solution to a very, very small (and mainly theoretical?) problem.

Theoretical? Yes. Really relevant? Very, very rarely. Changing the weighting for all subjects to 1/y2 (we got two deficiency letters) altered the 90% CI in the second decimal place.

» Let us apply weights 1/C^z in such a fashion that (:blahblah:)

Congratulations for an obvious solution (aka, re-inventing the wheel). ;-) See what Ohlbe wrote here and there.


PS: Typo? Didn’t you want Ratio[1]=0.05303?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,510 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 18:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There is one certainty in drug development
and statistics that one can depend on:
the data are always late.    Scott Patterson and Byron Jones

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5