An old solution [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-03-16 22:05 (763 d 13:23 ago) – Posting: # 20042
Views: 3,578

Hi ElMaestro,

» […] The smartest and most empirical solution to a very, very small (and mainly theoretical?) problem.

Theoretical? Yes. Really relevant? Very, very rarely. Changing the weighting for all subjects to 1/y2 (we got two deficiency letters) altered the 90% CI in the second decimal place.

» Let us apply weights 1/C^z in such a fashion that (:blahblah:)

Congratulations for an obvious solution (aka, re-inventing the wheel). ;-) See what Ohlbe wrote here and there.


PS: Typo? Didn’t you want Ratio[1]=0.05303?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,509 registered users;
online 8 (0 registered, 8 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 11:28 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing fails like success because you do not learn anything from it.
The only thing we ever learn from is failure.
Success only confirms our superstitions.    Kenneth E. Boulding

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5