An old solution [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-03-17 00:05 (1839 d 11:07 ago) – Posting: # 20042
Views: 5,151

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ […] The smartest and most empirical solution to a very, very small (and mainly theoretical?) problem.


Theoretical? Yes. Really relevant? Very, very rarely. Changing the weighting for all subjects to 1/y2 (we got two deficiency letters) altered the 90% CI in the second decimal place.

❝ Let us apply weights 1/C^z in such a fashion that (:blahblah:)


Congratulations for an obvious solution (aka, re-inventing the wheel). ;-) See what Ohlbe wrote here and there.


PS: Typo? Didn’t you want Ratio[1]=0.05303?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,957 posts in 4,819 threads, 1,636 registered users;
112 visitors (0 registered, 112 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:12 CET (Europe/Vienna)

With four parameters I can fit an elephant,
and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5