An old solution [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-03-16 23:05  – Posting: # 20042
Views: 1,694

Hi ElMaestro,

» […] The smartest and most empirical solution to a very, very small (and mainly theoretical?) problem.

Theoretical? Yes. Really relevant? Very, very rarely. Changing the weighting for all subjects to 1/y2 (we got two deficiency letters) altered the 90% CI in the second decimal place.

» Let us apply weights 1/C^z in such a fashion that (:blahblah:)

Congratulations for an obvious solution (aka, re-inventing the wheel). ;-) See what Ohlbe wrote here and there.

PS: Typo? Didn’t you want Ratio[1]=0.05303?

Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
20,103 posts in 4,243 threads, 1,382 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 02:40 CET

We must be careful not to confuse data with the abstractions
we use to analyze them.    William James

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz