one study, one method [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-03-13 19:23 (1722 d 01:24 ago) – Posting: # 20026
Views: 4,414

Salam Osama,

❝ […] The use of two methods or technologies within a

comparative BA/BE study is strongly discouraged:. ( i.e not applicable at all also with cross-validation).:confused::confused:

❝ Why ??


Honestly, I would not feel comfortable with such an approach as well. Even if two methods are fully validated and cross-validated against each other. Though, at least in a crossover it should be OK.
I faced very few examples that a validated method (you know, only spiked samples…) turned out to perform “not so good” on real samples. In these cases we developed another method and re-analysed all samples with the new method. I cannot imagine a situation when someone would change a suitable method within a study just for fun.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,811 posts in 4,783 threads, 1,640 registered users;
32 visitors (0 registered, 32 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:48 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Every man gets a narrower and narrower field of knowledge
in which he must be an expert in order to compete with other people.
The specialist knows more and more about less and less
and finally knows everything about nothing.    Konrad Lorenz

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5