Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

one study, one method [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut  – Vienna, Austria, 2019-03-13 18:23 (1167 d 01:25 ago) – Posting: # 20026
Views: 4,040

Salam Osama,

» […] The use of two methods or technologies within a
» comparative BA/BE study is strongly discouraged:. ( i.e not applicable at all also with cross-validation).
» Why ??

Honestly, I would not feel comfortable with such an approach as well. Even if two methods are fully validated and cross-validated against each other. Though, at least in a crossover it should be OK.
I faced very few examples that a validated method (you know, only spiked samples…) turned out to perform “not so good” on real samples. In these cases we developed another method and re-analysed all samples with the new method. I cannot imagine a situation when someone would change a suitable method within a study just for fun.

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz


The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

• Draft ICH M10 published Ohlbe 2019-03-03 23:18 [Regulatives / Guidelines] 
  • Consultation period? Helmut 2019-03-04 01:08
    • EU/EEA Ohlbe 2019-03-14 23:16
  • ICH M10 draft wienui 2019-03-13 18:06
    • Multiple methods within a single trial Ohlbe 2019-03-13 18:21
      • Multiple methods within a single trial wienui 2019-03-13 18:44
        • Multiple methods within a single trial Ohlbe 2019-03-13 19:10
          • Multiple methods within a single trial wienui 2019-03-13 19:35
            • Multiple methods within a single trial Ohlbe 2019-03-13 23:01
    • one study, one methodHelmut 2019-03-13 18:23