one study, one method [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-03-13 18:23 (566 d 10:23 ago) – Posting: # 20026
Views: 3,029

Salam Osama,

» […] The use of two methods or technologies within a
» comparative BA/BE study is strongly discouraged:. ( i.e not applicable at all also with cross-validation).:confused::confused:
» Why ??

Honestly, I would not feel comfortable with such an approach as well. Even if two methods are fully validated and cross-validated against each other. Though, at least in a crossover it should be OK.
I faced very few examples that a validated method (you know, only spiked samples…) turned out to perform “not so good” on real samples. In these cases we developed another method and re-analysed all samples with the new method. I cannot imagine a situation when someone would change a suitable method within a study just for fun.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,086 posts in 4,398 threads, 1,468 registered users;
online 7 (0 registered, 7 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 05:46 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

When puzzled, it never hurts to read the primary documents 
a rather simple and self-evident principle that has, nonetheless,
completely disappeared from large sectors
of the American experience.    Stephen Jay Gould

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5