one-sided / two-sided [General Statistics]
Hi ElMaestro,
sure. What I meant is: If a drug-naïve patient is treated with the originator’s product, the risk is 5%. With a 90% in BE the risk is also 5%.
sure. What I meant is: If a drug-naïve patient is treated with the originator’s product, the risk is 5%. With a 90% in BE the risk is also 5%.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Why BE testing use 90 CI akash 2019-02-23 08:39 [General Statistics]
- Why BE testing use 90 CI ElMaestro 2019-02-23 10:18
- Why BE testing use 90 CI Ohlbe 2019-03-03 23:07
- one-sided / two-sided Helmut 2019-03-04 01:20
- one-sided / two-sided ElMaestro 2019-03-04 09:04
- one-sided / two-sidedHelmut 2019-03-04 11:25
- one-sided / two-sided ElMaestro 2019-03-04 09:04
- one-sided / two-sided Helmut 2019-03-04 01:20
- Why BE testing use 90 CI Ohlbe 2019-03-03 23:07
- Why BE testing use 90 CI ElMaestro 2019-02-23 10:18