one-sided / two-sided [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2019-03-04 09:04 (636 d 03:06 ago) – Posting: # 19997
Views: 3,074

Hi Hötzi,

» In other words, if patients are treated with the originator’s product, there is a 5% risk that it does not perform better (more efficient and/or safer) than placebo.

There is no more than a 5% risk of approving the test product (=concluding superiority) if the test product is not superior.

» If we would test for BE at the 2.5% level (95% CI) we would be overly strict and at the same time gain absolutely nothing in terms of the patient’s risk.

The patient's risk would be halved (max 2.5% chance of approving a non-BE product; CIs would get wider).

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,

No, of course you do not need to audit your CRO if it was inspected in 1968 by the agency of Crabongostan.

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,217 posts in 4,427 threads, 1,481 registered users;
online 20 (0 registered, 20 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 12:10 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Half the harm that is done in this world
Is due to people who want to feel important.    T. S. Eliot

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz