Why BE testing use 90 CI [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2019-03-04 00:07 (1842 d 05:37 ago) – Posting: # 19992
Views: 4,246

Dear Akash,

❝ This is where the 90% CI comes into the equation. There is a (not more than) 5% risk associated with it (1-2*alpha).


My understanding of the reason why: the true T/R ratio cannot be at the same time lower than 0.8 and higher than 1.25. So even if you test the lower limit with a 5 % risk, and the higher limit with a 5 % risk, the overall risk still remains 5 % for the patients, not 10 %.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,940 posts in 4,812 threads, 1,640 registered users;
46 visitors (0 registered, 46 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:45 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Those people who think they know everything
are a great annoyance to those of us who do.    Isaac Asimov

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5