Pandora's box? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2019-03-01 17:40 (738 d 05:48 ago) – Posting: # 19982
Views: 3,956

Hi Guys (and Gals!),

It's a 2-way crossover US study (definitely not anywhere else, clinical done in 1990 so was report). Here is the exact wordings from the table (if that makes any difference to what I posted). Note that the summary table also presented +/- Westlake 95% CI..

Cmax(n=24):
Detectable differences(%)=13.28
T/R Ratio=93.86%
+/- Westlake 95% CI=20.12%
One sided t-test 90% CI:Lower limit= -18.33%, Upper Limit= -6.36%

Thanks
J

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,372 posts in 4,463 threads, 1,495 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 23:29 CET (Europe/Vienna)

When puzzled, it never hurts to read the primary documents 
a rather simple and self-evident principle that has, nonetheless,
completely disappeared from large sectors
of the American experience.    Stephen Jay Gould

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5