Strange result [Regulatives / Guidelines]
imho it's the CI for the difference in AUC(?) between T and R, although this is really a strange way to report the results. Might be to obfuscate somefink. Anyway I would be careful with data that old, if you don't have access to methods (including bioanalytics) and raw data.
—
Kindest regards, nobody
Kindest regards, nobody
Complete thread:
- History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI jag009 2019-02-25 22:03 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI nobody 2019-02-25 22:39
- History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI Helmut 2019-02-26 00:44
- History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI jag009 2019-02-26 15:19
- History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI nobody 2019-02-26 16:07
- Strange result Helmut 2019-02-28 12:03
- Strange resultnobody 2019-03-01 08:50
- Pandora's box? jag009 2019-03-01 17:40
- Confusing Helmut 2019-03-02 15:37
- Pandora's box? jag009 2019-03-01 17:40
- Strange result jag009 2019-03-01 17:44
- Transformation, acceptance range Helmut 2019-03-02 15:09
- Transformation, acceptance range nobody 2019-03-02 16:42
- Transformation, acceptance range Helmut 2019-03-02 15:09
- Strange resultnobody 2019-03-01 08:50
- History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI jag009 2019-02-26 15:19
- History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI Helmut 2019-02-26 00:44
- History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI nobody 2019-02-25 22:39