History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2019-02-26 14:19 (643 d 11:17 ago) – Posting: # 19976
Views: 3,878

Thanks guys!

» @John: The 90% CI was recommended in 1992.7

Thanks Helmut. The reason I asked is because I read some report (dated 1990; the synopsis only) and the one sided 90% CI was reported as lower = -18.33%, upper = -6.36%; T/R Ratio = 93.86, n=24. I found it strange to report CI in such a way so I was wondering if the reporting was based on some old rules.

Thanks
J

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,224 posts in 4,427 threads, 1,481 registered users;
online 13 (0 registered, 13 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 01:37 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

The fundamental cause of trouble in the world today is
that the stupid are cocksure
while the intelligent are full of doubt.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5