History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2019-02-26 15:19 (846 d 04:03 ago) – Posting: # 19976
Views: 4,353

Thanks guys!

» @John: The 90% CI was recommended in 1992.7

Thanks Helmut. The reason I asked is because I read some report (dated 1990; the synopsis only) and the one sided 90% CI was reported as lower = -18.33%, upper = -6.36%; T/R Ratio = 93.86, n=24. I found it strange to report CI in such a way so I was wondering if the reporting was based on some old rules.

Thanks
J

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,530 posts in 4,499 threads, 1,524 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 20:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Young man, in mathematics you don’t understand things.
You just get used to them.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5