History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2019-02-26 15:19 (1214 d 22:43 ago) – Posting: # 19976
Views: 4,939

Thanks guys!

» @John: The 90% CI was recommended in 1992.7

Thanks Helmut. The reason I asked is because I read some report (dated 1990; the synopsis only) and the one sided 90% CI was reported as lower = -18.33%, upper = -6.36%; T/R Ratio = 93.86, n=24. I found it strange to report CI in such a way so I was wondering if the reporting was based on some old rules.

Thanks
J

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,166 posts in 4,645 threads, 1,572 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 15:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Absolute certainty is a privilege of uneducated minds  and fanatics.
It is, for scientific folk, an unattainable ideal.    Cassius J. Keyser

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5