History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2019-02-26 14:19 (741 d 06:34 ago) – Posting: # 19976
Views: 4,064

Thanks guys!

» @John: The 90% CI was recommended in 1992.7

Thanks Helmut. The reason I asked is because I read some report (dated 1990; the synopsis only) and the one sided 90% CI was reported as lower = -18.33%, upper = -6.36%; T/R Ratio = 93.86, n=24. I found it strange to report CI in such a way so I was wondering if the reporting was based on some old rules.

Thanks
J

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,371 posts in 4,463 threads, 1,495 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 20:54 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

When puzzled, it never hurts to read the primary documents 
a rather simple and self-evident principle that has, nonetheless,
completely disappeared from large sectors
of the American experience.    Stephen Jay Gould

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5