History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI [Regulatives / Guidelines]
Thanks guys!
Thanks Helmut. The reason I asked is because I read some report (dated 1990; the synopsis only) and the one sided 90% CI was reported as lower = -18.33%, upper = -6.36%; T/R Ratio = 93.86, n=24. I found it strange to report CI in such a way so I was wondering if the reporting was based on some old rules.
Thanks
J
❝ @John: The 90% CI was recommended in 1992.7
Thanks Helmut. The reason I asked is because I read some report (dated 1990; the synopsis only) and the one sided 90% CI was reported as lower = -18.33%, upper = -6.36%; T/R Ratio = 93.86, n=24. I found it strange to report CI in such a way so I was wondering if the reporting was based on some old rules.
Thanks
J
Complete thread:
- History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI jag009 2019-02-25 22:03 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI nobody 2019-02-25 22:39
- History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI Helmut 2019-02-26 00:44
- History lessons - FDA BE 90% CIjag009 2019-02-26 15:19
- History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI nobody 2019-02-26 16:07
- Strange result Helmut 2019-02-28 12:03
- Strange result nobody 2019-03-01 08:50
- Pandora's box? jag009 2019-03-01 17:40
- Confusing Helmut 2019-03-02 15:37
- Pandora's box? jag009 2019-03-01 17:40
- Strange result jag009 2019-03-01 17:44
- Transformation, acceptance range Helmut 2019-03-02 15:09
- Transformation, acceptance range nobody 2019-03-02 16:42
- Transformation, acceptance range Helmut 2019-03-02 15:09
- Strange result nobody 2019-03-01 08:50
- History lessons - FDA BE 90% CIjag009 2019-02-26 15:19
- History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI Helmut 2019-02-26 00:44
- History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI nobody 2019-02-25 22:39