History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2019-02-26 15:19 (606 d 00:55 ago) – Posting: # 19976
Views: 3,816

Thanks guys!

» @John: The 90% CI was recommended in 1992.7

Thanks Helmut. The reason I asked is because I read some report (dated 1990; the synopsis only) and the one sided 90% CI was reported as lower = -18.33%, upper = -6.36%; T/R Ratio = 93.86, n=24. I found it strange to report CI in such a way so I was wondering if the reporting was based on some old rules.

Thanks
J

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,179 posts in 4,414 threads, 1,474 registered users;
online 11 (0 registered, 11 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 17:14 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is the peculiar and perpetual error of the human understanding
to be more moved and excited by affirmatives than negatives.    Francis Bacon

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5