History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2019-02-26 16:19 (1909 d 18:36 ago) – Posting: # 19976
Views: 5,686

Thanks guys!

❝ @John: The 90% CI was recommended in 1992.7


Thanks Helmut. The reason I asked is because I read some report (dated 1990; the synopsis only) and the one sided 90% CI was reported as lower = -18.33%, upper = -6.36%; T/R Ratio = 93.86, n=24. I found it strange to report CI in such a way so I was wondering if the reporting was based on some old rules.

Thanks
J

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,033 posts in 4,835 threads, 1,642 registered users;
41 visitors (0 registered, 41 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5