History lessons - FDA BE 90% CI [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2019-02-26 16:19 (2172 d 17:23 ago) – Posting: # 19976
Views: 6,819

Thanks guys!

❝ @John: The 90% CI was recommended in 1992.7


Thanks Helmut. The reason I asked is because I read some report (dated 1990; the synopsis only) and the one sided 90% CI was reported as lower = -18.33%, upper = -6.36%; T/R Ratio = 93.86, n=24. I found it strange to report CI in such a way so I was wondering if the reporting was based on some old rules.

Thanks
J

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,376 posts in 4,912 threads, 1,664 registered users;
190 visitors (0 registered, 190 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:43 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Every system is perfectly designed
to get the results it gets.    Paul B. Batalden

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5