A weird CI [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-02-24 14:05 (1944 d 04:10 ago) – Posting: # 19969
Views: 4,078

Hi all,

I am in a strange situation a follows:

We have two treatment groups.
In one group the subjects receive T once.
In the other treatment group subject receive R twice.
The task is simply to construct a 90% CI for T vs R :-)

You may feel like asking questions starting eloquently with words such as "How the eff you see kay....?!???!", or "What the h#ll.... !??!!?".
Please don't :-D

Make all the assumptions you wish. I am going to do the same.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,059 posts in 4,841 threads, 1,665 registered users;
42 visitors (0 registered, 42 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:16 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

[…] an inappropriate study design is incapable of answering
a research question, no matter how careful the subsequent
methodology, conduct, analysis, and interpretation:
Flawless execution of a flawed design achieves nothing worthwhile.    J. Rick Turner

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5