Why BE testing use 90 CI [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by akash – India, 2019-02-23 09:39 (1861 d 04:27 ago) – Posting: # 19967
Views: 4,934

Why Bioequivalence testing makes use of the 90 CI why not 95 CI which gives more accuracy?


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1. Please follow the Forum’s Policy[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,957 posts in 4,819 threads, 1,636 registered users;
113 visitors (0 registered, 113 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:06 CET (Europe/Vienna)

With four parameters I can fit an elephant,
and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5