Why BE testing use 90 CI [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by akash – India, 2019-02-23 08:39 (841 d 06:56 ago) – Posting: # 19967
Views: 4,020

Why Bioequivalence testing makes use of the 90 CI why not 95 CI which gives more accuracy?


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1. Please follow the Forum’s Policy[Helmut]

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,518 posts in 4,498 threads, 1,523 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 16:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A refund for defective software might be nice,
except it would bankrupt the entire software industry
in the first year.    Andrew S. Tanenbaum

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5