Why BE testing use 90 CI [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by akash – India, 2019-02-23 08:39  – Posting: # 19967
Views: 731

Why Bioequivalence testing makes use of the 90 CI why not 95 CI which gives more accuracy?


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1. Please follow the Forum’s Policy[Helmut]

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,487 posts in 4,135 threads, 1,336 registered users;
online 12 (0 registered, 12 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 19:18 CEST

If debugging is the process of removing bugs,
then programming must be the process of putting them in.    Edsger W. Dijkstra

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5