tlast (Common) [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-02-21 17:32 (2179 d 13:01 ago) – Posting: # 19961
Views: 10,267

Hello nobody,

❝ So what is your solution, do you specify in the protocol/SOP that AUC0-tlast is calculated employing tlast common? Any outcries in EU? Did anybody (sponsor/reg) recognize/ask back?


As far as I know, regulators are well aware of the publications of Getz et al. They totally get the idea aired in their papers, but they don't change their views or ask applicants to change practices.
We also need to bear in mind that it is quite common to have time point deviations on late samples, especially if they are ambulatory. Some of those are missing, even.
There is, for practical purposes, not always a crystal clear way we can speak of a meaningful last common time point regardless of how well the trial is planned and executed.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,376 posts in 4,912 threads, 1,665 registered users;
144 visitors (0 registered, 144 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:34 CET (Europe/Vienna)

There are sadistic scientists who hurry to hunt down errors
instead of establishing the truth.    Marie Curie

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5