Oops! df! [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2019-02-21 11:54 (2152 d 13:39 ago) – Posting: # 19956
Views: 11,803

Dear Helmut,

❝ ❝ ❝ Degrees of freedom?

❝ ❝

❝ ❝ Presumable YES. ... Maybe they are or can be different, IIRC. Why ever.


❝ ANOVA: 30 (well…)

❝ TaaTP:

❝   B/A 8

❝   C/A 8

❝   D/A 9


❝ 8? 9?? What the heck? ... I don’t get it.


Ok, something like that I have expected.
Let's try a 'theoretical' approach. Since we do not recode the periods and / or sequences the df can be obtained via (model without decomposition of the subjects effect into sequence and subject within sequence, design 4x4)

source    df
-------------------------------
Total    2*n-1 = 23
treat    t-1   =  1
period   p-1   =  3
subject  n-1   = 11
-------------------------------
error    n-4   = 23-1-3-11 = 8
-------------------------------


So far so good. Two numbers of three 'explained'. Why the heck the comparison D/A has one degree of freedom more: Duno :confused:.
We have already noticed a similar effect for the EMA 'crippled' model for replicate designs. See this post.

Nevertheless: The degrees of freedom are different for the 2x2 design and the design of the TaaTP. We can mimic the df's, at least approximately, if we use the robust df's.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,359 posts in 4,905 threads, 1,671 registered users;
96 visitors (0 registered, 96 guests [including 31 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:34 CET (Europe/Vienna)

You are rewarding a teacher poorly
if you remain always a pupil.    Friedrich Nietzsche

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5