Oops! df? [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-02-20 21:43 (2155 d 05:22 ago) – Posting: # 19947
Views: 11,580

Dear Detlew,

❝ ❝ Degrees of freedom?


❝ Presumable YES. Since you have already done the Two-at-a-Time evaluation, look at the error degrees of freedom. And be so kind to post them here, and pay attention to look at the df's for all comparisons. Maybe they are or can be different, IIRC. Why ever.


ANOVA: 30 (well…)
TaaTP:
  B/A 8
  C/A 8
  D/A 9

8? 9?? What the heck? Checked my setup until my eyes got dry. In all datasets for the TaaTP I have 12 subjects. Each of the four sequences is allocated to three subjects: ACBD (1, 5, 9), BADC (2, 6, 10), CDAB (3, 7, 11), DBCA (4, 8, 12). Each subject is allocated to exactly two (and the correct) treatments. I don’t get it.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,362 posts in 4,906 threads, 1,674 registered users;
91 visitors (0 registered, 91 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:06 CET (Europe/Vienna)

I have not failed 700 times. I have not failed once.
I have succeeded in proving
that those 700 ways will not work.    Thomas Alva Edison

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5