Oops! df? [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2019-02-20 19:45 (948 d 09:39 ago) – Posting: # 19946
Views: 8,017

Dear Helmut,

» What puzzles me is that in the latter case the calculated CVs don’t match the models’ (24.35↔23.72, 16.57↔16.15, 22.73↔22.47). Knapp vorbei ist auch daneben.

My grandma had another sentence in some sort of Plattdütsch language: Dicht doarnebn is ok vorbü.

» Degrees of freedom?

Presumable YES. Since you have already done the Two-at-a-Time evaluation, look at the error degrees of freedom. And be so kind to post them here, and pay attention to look at the df's for all comparisons. Maybe they are or can be different, IIRC. Why ever.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,699 posts in 4,537 threads, 1,542 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 06:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A central lesson of science is that to understand complex issues
(or even simple ones), we must try to free our minds of dogma and
to guarantee the freedom to publish, to contradict, and to experiment.
Arguments from authority are unacceptable.    Carl Sagan

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5