Oops! df? [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2019-02-20 19:45 (942 d 07:45 ago) – Posting: # 19946
Views: 7,983

Dear Helmut,

» What puzzles me is that in the latter case the calculated CVs don’t match the models’ (24.35↔23.72, 16.57↔16.15, 22.73↔22.47). Knapp vorbei ist auch daneben.

My grandma had another sentence in some sort of Plattdütsch language: Dicht doarnebn is ok vorbü.

» Degrees of freedom?

Presumable YES. Since you have already done the Two-at-a-Time evaluation, look at the error degrees of freedom. And be so kind to post them here, and pay attention to look at the df's for all comparisons. Maybe they are or can be different, IIRC. Why ever.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,691 posts in 4,534 threads, 1,541 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 04:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

They were “so intent of making everything numerical”
that they frequently missed seeing
what was there to be seen.    Barbara McClintock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5