Oops! df? [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2019-02-20 20:45 (2121 d 15:20 ago) – Posting: # 19946
Views: 11,878

Dear Helmut,

❝ What puzzles me is that in the latter case the calculated CVs don’t match the models’ (24.35↔23.72, 16.57↔16.15, 22.73↔22.47). Knapp vorbei ist auch daneben.


My grandma had another sentence in some sort of Plattdütsch language: Dicht doarnebn is ok vorbü.

❝ Degrees of freedom?


Presumable YES. Since you have already done the Two-at-a-Time evaluation, look at the error degrees of freedom. And be so kind to post them here, and pay attention to look at the df's for all comparisons. Maybe they are or can be different, IIRC. Why ever.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,336 posts in 4,902 threads, 1,667 registered users;
30 visitors (0 registered, 30 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:05 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Biostatistician. One who has neither the intellect for mathematics
nor the commitment for medicine but likes to dabble in both.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5