software: NCA not validated [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-02-16 14:59 (1949 d 01:00 ago) – Posting: # 19928
Views: 11,380

Hi Nastia,

❝ […] it turns out that in some rare extreme cases it is worth to think about alternative approaches. Would it be accepted?


As I said numerous times – if described in the protocol – yes.

❝ How to be sure that the method stated in SAP would work better than PHX algo? Is it possible to explain in the report any disagreement with PHX output?


Good questions. No software is validated when it comes to NCA. Assessors/inspectors are you aware of it? See my attempt there.
For years the NCA Consortium is struggling to come up with sumfink. You have to apply for membership; interesting enough the majority of members are coming from originators or the academia. The task turned out to be rather difficult…

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,057 posts in 4,840 threads, 1,641 registered users;
81 visitors (0 registered, 81 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:59 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You should treat as many patients as possible with the new drugs
while they still have the power to heal.    Armand Trousseau

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5