software: NCA not validated [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-02-16 14:59 (1682 d 18:47 ago) – Posting: # 19928
Views: 9,917

Hi Nastia,

❝ […] it turns out that in some rare extreme cases it is worth to think about alternative approaches. Would it be accepted?


As I said numerous times – if described in the protocol – yes.

❝ How to be sure that the method stated in SAP would work better than PHX algo? Is it possible to explain in the report any disagreement with PHX output?


Good questions. No software is validated when it comes to NCA. Assessors/inspectors are you aware of it? See my attempt there.
For years the NCA Consortium is struggling to come up with sumfink. You have to apply for membership; interesting enough the majority of members are coming from originators or the academia. The task turned out to be rather difficult…

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,759 posts in 4,775 threads, 1,628 registered users;
17 visitors (0 registered, 17 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:46 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Whenever a theory appears to you as the only possible one,
take this as a sign that you have neither understood the theory
nor the problem which it was intended to solve.    Karl R. Popper

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5