software: NCA not validated [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-02-16 13:59 (1227 d 13:45 ago) – Posting: # 19928
Views: 8,315

Hi Nastia,

» […] it turns out that in some rare extreme cases it is worth to think about alternative approaches. Would it be accepted?

As I said numerous times – if described in the protocol – yes.

» How to be sure that the method stated in SAP would work better than PHX algo? Is it possible to explain in the report any disagreement with PHX output?

Good questions. No software is validated when it comes to NCA. Assessors/inspectors are you aware of it? See my attempt there.
For years the NCA Consortium is struggling to come up with sumfink. You have to apply for membership; interesting enough the majority of members are coming from originators or the academia. The task turned out to be rather difficult…

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,178 posts in 4,646 threads, 1,571 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 04:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is futile to do with more things
that which can be done with fewer.    William of Ockham

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5