software: NCA not validated [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-02-16 13:59  – Posting: # 19928
Views: 1,238

Hi Nasty,

» […] it turns out that in some rare extreme cases it is worth to think about alternative approaches. Would it be accepted?

As I said numerous times – if described in the protocol – yes.

» How to be sure that the method stated in SAP would work better than PHX algo? Is it possible to explain in the report any disagreement with PHX output?

Good questions. No software is validated when it comes to NCA. Assessors/inspectors are you aware of it? See my attempt there.
For years the NCA Consortium is struggling to come up with sumfink. You have to apply for membership; interesting enough the majority of members are coming from originators or the academia. The task turned out to be rather difficult…

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,486 posts in 4,135 threads, 1,334 registered users;
online 15 (0 registered, 15 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 23:46 CEST

If you don’t know anything about computers,
just remember that they are machines that do exactly what you tell them
but often surprise you in the result.    Richard Dawkins

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5