ANOVA fixed and random effects [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Babe_Ruth – USA, 2019-02-08 20:46 (600 d 11:26 ago) – Posting: # 19893
Views: 3,363

Hi ElMaestro

» Yikes. Do you mean single ascending doses, mutiple ascending doses? That would likely make this a first in man, potentially?? I am not sure I would like to offer opinions on those. Is the API very well known??
Yes, that's what I meant with SAD and MAD. Yes, first in human. API is not known, but the its target is pretty hot these days. They call her Jaki.

» "Subject in sequence" ... only has relevance if you don't number subjects uniquely.
:surprised: whoa, mind blown. Applied to my question above, "Subject as a random effect" is the same as "Subject nested in treatment condition (Fed/Fasted)"? Given that subject numbers are all unique.

» I tend to bang my head into the table when it happens.
This explains both your intelligence and your insanity =D

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,090 posts in 4,398 threads, 1,469 registered users;
online 12 (0 registered, 12 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 09:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In these days, a man who says a thing cannot be done
is quite apt to be interrupted by some idiot doing it.    Elbert Green Hubbard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5