Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 11:17 CET

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

ANOVA fixed and random effects [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Babe_Ruth - USA, 2019-02-08 20:46  - Posting: # 19893
Views: 248

Hi ElMaestro

» Yikes. Do you mean single ascending doses, mutiple ascending doses? That would likely make this a first in man, potentially?? I am not sure I would like to offer opinions on those. Is the API very well known??

Yes, that's what I meant with SAD and MAD. Yes, first in human. API is not known, but the its target is pretty hot these days. They call her Jaki.

» "Subject in sequence" ... only has relevance if you don't number subjects uniquely.

:surprised: whoa, mind blown. Applied to my question above, "Subject as a random effect" is the same as "Subject nested in treatment condition (Fed/Fasted)"? Given that subject numbers are all unique.

» I tend to bang my head into the table when it happens.

This explains both your intelligence and your insanity =D

Complete thread:

 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,187 posts in 4,084 threads, 1,308 registered users;
online 13 (0 registered, 13 guests [including 11 identified bots]).

In these days, a man who says a thing cannot be done
is quite apt to be interrupted by some idiot doing it.    Elbert Green Hubbard

BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz