ANOVA fixed and random effects [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Babe_Ruth – USA, 2019-02-08 20:46 (906 d 21:09 ago) – Posting: # 19893
Views: 4,017

Hi ElMaestro

» Yikes. Do you mean single ascending doses, mutiple ascending doses? That would likely make this a first in man, potentially?? I am not sure I would like to offer opinions on those. Is the API very well known??

Yes, that's what I meant with SAD and MAD. Yes, first in human. API is not known, but the its target is pretty hot these days. They call her Jaki.

» "Subject in sequence" ... only has relevance if you don't number subjects uniquely.

:surprised: whoa, mind blown. Applied to my question above, "Subject as a random effect" is the same as "Subject nested in treatment condition (Fed/Fasted)"? Given that subject numbers are all unique.

» I tend to bang my head into the table when it happens.

This explains both your intelligence and your insanity =D

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,606 posts in 4,517 threads, 1,532 registered users;
online 15 (0 registered, 15 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 18:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are no routine statistical questions,
only questionable statistical routines.    David R. Cox

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5