ANOVA fixed and random effects [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Babe_Ruth – USA, 2019-02-08 18:32  – Posting: # 19889
Views: 1,280

What's the appropriate ANOVA model for a two treatment, two period, fixed sequence study?

It's a food effect study where the subject takes the study drug under fasted conditions, 14-day washout, then takes study drug under fed conditions. The proposed is ANOVA model is to analyze log-transformed Cmax and AUClast with terms for treatment condition (Fasted and Fed) as a fixed effect and subject as a random effect.

Is this appropriate, and why or why not?

Compared to the standard 2x2 crossover study, what are the limitations of the above study design in terms of assessing inter- and intra-subject variability?

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,694 posts in 4,181 threads, 1,355 registered users;
online 11 (0 registered, 11 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 13:23 CEST

A central lesson of science is that to understand complex issues
(or even simple ones), we must try to free our minds of dogma and
to guarantee the freedom to publish, to contradict, and to experiment.
Arguments from authority are unacceptable.    Carl Sagan

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5