Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 11:23 CET

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

ANOVA fixed and random effects [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Babe_Ruth - USA, 2019-02-08 18:32  - Posting: # 19889
Views: 295

What's the appropriate ANOVA model for a two treatment, two period, fixed sequence study?

It's a food effect study where the subject takes the study drug under fasted conditions, 14-day washout, then takes study drug under fed conditions. The proposed is ANOVA model is to analyze log-transformed Cmax and AUClast with terms for treatment condition (Fasted and Fed) as a fixed effect and subject as a random effect.

Is this appropriate, and why or why not?

Compared to the standard 2x2 crossover study, what are the limitations of the above study design in terms of assessing inter- and intra-subject variability?

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,187 posts in 4,084 threads, 1,308 registered users;
online 12 (0 registered, 12 guests [including 8 identified bots]).

In these days, a man who says a thing cannot be done
is quite apt to be interrupted by some idiot doing it.    Elbert Green Hubbard

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed