Rules acc. to Health Canada [Outliers]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2019-02-05 15:30 (593 d 05:38 ago) – Posting: # 19868
Views: 4,256

Hi Helmut,

yes it was meant to indicate that if one metric is outlier then the others should be as well before exclusion is appropriate. However, I don't think they are always enforcing it that way. After all, rate is not the same as extent and vice versa.

But does it make a big difference? Exclusion changes little in your case since it was a pilot and you will need to consider the sample size and relevance of the CV and PE sampled in the pilot when planning the pivotal in any case.

If Cmax and AUC were more or less normal for the subject, then in all likelihood she munched the medication as directed to and what you saw is populations , products and random happenings at work.

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,
ElMaestro

R's base package has 274 reserved words and operators, along with 1761 functions. I can use 18 of them (about 14 of them properly). I believe this makes me the Donald Trump of programming.

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,068 posts in 4,392 threads, 1,465 registered users;
online 13 (0 registered, 13 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 22:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Data is not information.
Information is not knowledge.
And knowledge is certainly not wisdom.    Clifford Stoll

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5