Concentration-time graphs and NCA [PK / PD]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-02-02 17:30 (1239 d 10:00 ago) – Posting: # 19849
Views: 2,481

Hi ElMaestro & Smitha,

» » 2. a. If the actual time-point is used even if the sampling deviation is within the window
» »       period, is it appropriate? Is there an impact on the PK data e.g AUC?
» I think it is common to use the nominal point for both plotting and AUC-calculation when the sample is inside the window (note: not all CROs apply windows). Otherwise use actual time for both.

I suggest to always use the actual time points (individual plots and NCA) and scheduled ones only for summary (by treatment) plots. Only once I saw a report where medians of actual time points were used. IMHO, a little bit over the top.

A note on “time allowance windows”. In most CROs the actual time point has to be recorded in the CRF anyhow. Only if a deviation from the scheduled time is larger than allowed, an explanation has to be given in the CRF (see also this post).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,167 posts in 4,645 threads, 1,572 registered users;
online 20 (0 registered, 20 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 04:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The person interested in success has to learn
to view failure as a healthy, inevitable part
of the process of getting to the top.    Joyce Brothers

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz